[12092013] Biology In Forensics ≡
Posted on Monday, September 16, 2013 at 9:22 PM
Watch this video closely:
If you could point out the differences, props to you. If you couldn't point them out or if you sensed something different but you couldn't put your finger on it, then don't worry because you're a part of the majority of people who couldn't! (Sorry, not all of us are special). What this video proves is the unreliability of eyewitness testimonies in court and in life. We overestimate the accuracy of eyewitness testimonies, often disregarding the factors which influence a witness's ability to accurately identify a suspect, including how much stress a witness is under, whether a weapon is present, the amount of time a witness had to look at the person, the lighting present at the time, how long it's been since someone first witnessed the crime or suggestions of guilt by police, etc. This point, fortunately, has been brought to the attention of the court and now measures are being taken to prevent false accusations based solely on eyewitness testimonies. Thankfully, we have Forensics Biology to help us identify the true verdict through hard evidence. This is exactly what we covered in Jerrel's missing iPod case. While attempting to pin point the iPod thief, we attempted to investigate what exactly were the substances this criminal left on the crime scene (careless, rookie mistake). However, before attempting to see what substances made up this compound, we first had to figure out how to identify whether or not a substance contained protein, glucose, lipids or carbohydrates.
After testing the sample of evidence for glucose, starch, protein or lipids, we came to the conclusion that Bruce was the criminal in this case because he ate Toast with butter and jelly for lunch, which corresponds to the crumbs that were left on the crime scene. The crumbs only had glucose present, which means that it had to be Bruce because no other employee had only glucose present in their lunch meal. Case closed. |
|
|
0 Comment:
Post a comment